Income tax penalty u/s 271c

WebApr 11, 2024 · The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty is not leviable in absence of proper show cause notice to the assessee.. Zile Singh … WebSep 7, 2024 · 3.Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs.4,60,000 was levied vide order dated 26/04/2024. ... In the given case, the Departmental appeal is on the interpretation of section 275 of the …

US Technology International Pvt ltd Vs Commissioner of Income-tax …

WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the provisions of Section 271C dealt with penalty for failure to deduct the tax and not delayed payment of tax. The court accepting the arguments of the Appellant’s AR that the penal provisions ... Web1 day ago · The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was served on the assessee on 22.09.2016. The Assessing Officer(AO) passed assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 The AO has levied penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the penalty order the Assessee had filed appeal … eastview basketball tournament 2021 https://thepreserveshop.com

Mere belated TDS Remittance won

WebAug 3, 2024 · The plain reading of section 271 (1) (c) of Income Tax act 1961 clearly states as follows “Concealment of particulars of income or fringe benefits or furnishing of … WebApr 10, 2024 · In all the cases, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201 (1A) of the Act levied penal interest for the period of delay in remittance of TDS. Further, … eastview baptist church kilgore tx

Non-specification of limb of notice render section 271(1)(c) penalty …

Category:Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Digest of case laws

Tags:Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income Tax - Levy of penalty u/s 271C - delay in deposit of Tax ...

WebProvided  that no penalty shall be levied in respect of income referred to in section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D to the extent such … WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the …

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Did you know?

WebPenalty u/s. 271(1)(c): Initiation, Satisfaction & Levy – The Unwritten Mandates Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 prescribes two faults or omissions which exposes … Web3 hours ago · 6. Thus, from the above, it is evident that non-specification of the limb of the notice would render the penalty proceedings invalid. Accordingly, respectfully following the precedent, we set-aside the orders of the authorities below holding that notice u/s 271 (1) (c) is omnibus notice, thus defective which goes to the root of the matter.

WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB , 271FB, 271G, 271GA , 271GB , 271H, 271-I , 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or … WebSection 271C of Income Tax Act. Section 271C of Income Tax Act lays down the law relating to the penalty which should be imposed by the Income Tax Department for failure to …

WebMar 24, 2009 · In fact in the orders passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, they have been mentioning “Initiate Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1) (C) of the I T Act” by default on additions/disallowances done without providing any reasons irrespective of whether the assessee really tried to conceal his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of his ... WebApr 12, 2024 · Even the CBDT has decided to impose no penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS, and no penalty is contemplated under Section 271C for delayed remittance, payment, or deposit of the TDS. The court stated, asserting the CBDT’s Circular No. 551 dated January 23, 1998. The assessee was not required to pay …

WebSection 271C (1): (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or. (b) pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or …

WebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after the same has been deducted by the assessee. The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar observed that the relevant words used in Section eastview baptist church rock hill scWebNov 19, 2015 · Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, mandates that a specified percentage of Tax is required to be deducted by the payer at the time of making certain payments to the payee. … cumbrian english pointersWebIncome Tax Levy of penalty u/s 271C - delay in deposit of Tax deducted at source (TDS) - Section 271C(1)(a) shall be applicable in case of a failure on the part of the concerned … cumbrian cracker photosWebApr 12, 2024 · The Supreme Court (SC) of India has held that mere belated TDS remittance won’t attract a penalty under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. M/s US Technologies, the appellant challenged the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in confirming the levy of interest/penalty under … cumbrian fisherWebC.Penalty for failure to deduct tax at source u/s 271C Failure to deduct the whole or any part of the tax— • As required under the provisions of Chapter XVIIB, or • As required under section 115 -O(2) or • As per second proviso to section 194B cumbria news bbcWebFeb 2, 2024 · Applicability of provisions of section 271C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty under section 271C is applicable under the following conditions –. The person fails to deduct, the whole or part of, tax at source (i.e. TDS). The person fails to pay, the whole … eastview basketball scheduleWebApr 12, 2024 · On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy a penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. The High Court vide impugned judgment and order has dismissed the appeal preferred by the assessee by holding that failure to deduct/remit the TDS would attract a penalty under … eastview bmw